The AI Shell Game

Hi there, AI Strategists,

What do $45/hour nurses and $9/hour AI “caregivers” have in common? Apparently… everything.

In today’s issue, we’re spotlighting SergeiAI’s brilliant (and brutal) breakdown of “hypocritical AI”—where companies pitch automation but quietly pay humans to clean up the mess. We’ll also dig into the UAE’s law-drafting AI ambitions, a rogue support bot that handed out admin access, and MIT’s new technique that forces LLMs to finally respect syntax.

If you're making enterprise AI bets right now, this is the intel that keeps you out of someone else's failure postmortem.

Let’s get into it.

Start learning AI in 2025

Keeping up with AI is hard – we get it!

That’s why over 1M professionals read Superhuman AI to stay ahead.

• Get daily AI news, tools, and tutorials

• Learn new AI skills you can use at work in 3 mins a day

• Become 10X more productive

Sign up and start mastering AI

When “AI-First” Means “Babysitting the Algorithm”

SergeiAI offers us a two-part gem (and gut-punch) on hypocritical AI initiatives. If you’re making AI buying decisions, it’s required reading.

The TL;DR:
An AI company pitched its product as a cost-saving, nurse-replacing “virtual caregiver.” But behind the curtain was a team of $45/hour real nurses monitoring, correcting, and cleaning up after its mistakes. The AI wasn’t scalable. It was smoke and mirrors with a shadow labor force.

Why this hits home for enterprise buyers:
You’re not just buying software. You’re buying:

• Liability if the AI goes rogue.

• Ongoing human ops to babysit immature models.

• The illusion of margin gains when the real cost is operational drag.

Key questions to ask vendors before signing:

1. What exact tasks are handled by humans behind the scenes?

2. What’s your escalation rate from AI to human intervention?

3. How do you audit for hallucination, failure loops, or edge cases?

4. What’s your human labor cost per AI decision?

Because here’s the dirty little secret of AI economics:
If your vendor can’t answer those questions clearly, you’re not buying AI—you’re buying a liability in a trench coat.

UAE’s AI-Legislation Play: Genius, Gimmick, or Just GovTech PR?

In a move straight out of a sci-fi spec sheet, the UAE announced that AI will draft federal legislation—making it the first country to do so at a national level.

• The Ministry of Possibilities (yes, that’s real) says AI will draft initial versions of laws.

• Human policymakers will review, revise, and approve.

• Their pitch? Speed, objectivity, and tech-forward governance.

What enterprise buyers should really watch here: It’s not about whether the AI is perfect. It’s about how much infrastructure gets built around it to make sure it’s safe, useful, and aligned.

This isn’t AI replacing judgment—it’s AI replacing stalling.

A Customer Support AI Went Rogue—and It’s a Warning Worth Heeding

Cursor, a startup using an AI assistant to handle developer customer support, went off-script—offering users unauthorized software features, writing bad code, and even agreeing to give itself admin privileges.

The company called it a "super embarrassing moment." Understatement of the year.

Key takeaway: LLMs don’t have a risk floor until you give them one. Guardrails, oversight, and continuous monitoring aren’t “nice-to-haves”—they’re the difference between automation and chaos.

If you're evaluating AI for customer service, ask vendors not just what it can do—but what it’s prevented from doing.

MIT’s Code Whisperer: A New Way to Make LLMs Actually Follow the Rules

Good news for your dev team’s blood pressure: MIT researchers have created a technique that forces LLMs to generate code that obeys programming language syntax and structure.

• It works across languages and use cases.

• It doesn’t require retraining the model—just a smarter prompt wrapper.

• And it’s open-source-ish enough to fold into enterprise workflows fast.

Why this matters: Code-gen isn’t just a GitHub toy anymore. This makes it safer, cleaner, and way more usable in structured environments.

TL;DR:

• Buying AI isn’t safer than building—it’s just risky in different ways. Delay is the real killer.

• The UAE is letting AI draft laws—but still wisely keeps humans in the loop. (Copy this structure for your AI workflows.)

• Cursor’s rogue AI shows what happens when you skip guardrails.

• MIT just gave us a better way to generate accurate, format-compliant code from LLMs. Big win for enterprise dev teams.

Stay sharp,

Cat Valverde
Founder, Enterprise AI Solutions
Navigating Tomorrow's Tech Landscape Together