The Curious Case of OpenAI: From Altruism to IPO?

Let’s get one thing straight: OpenAI was never just another startup. From its nonprofit origins to the current IPO speculation whirlwind, it has been a soap opera of genius, ambition, and philosophical whiplash. And this week, with new lawsuits and internal restructuring in the air, it’s worth pausing to ask: How did we get here, and what happens next?

If you’ve been nodding through conversations about OpenAI’s hybrid structure and Sam Altman’s leadership drama, this is your cheat sheet.

Let’s rewind.

Don’t get SaaD. Get Rippling.

Hundreds of apps create silos, wasted time, and missed opportunities. Rippling replaces SaaD (Software as a Disservice) with one system to run HR, IT, and Finance – without the drag.

Take a stand against SaaD today.

Is SaaD hurting your org?

From Saving Humanity to $150B: OpenAI's Wild Pivot

Let's rewind to December 2015. Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and a crew of Silicon Valley's brightest gather with $1 billion in pledges and a radical idea: build artificial general intelligence (AGI) that benefits all humanity. Not specific parts of humanity. Not shareholders. Everyone. Like, in the world.

Their original charter was aggressive and idealistic:

• OpenAI would be transparent.

• It would share research freely.

• And it wouldn’t let profit motives override safety.

They chose a nonprofit structure for a reason. The thinking went like this: if you're building something that could fundamentally reshape civilization, maybe profit motives aren't the best guardrails. They wanted researchers focused on safety and alignment, not quarterly earnings calls.

Fast forward to 2019, and reality starts knocking. Turns out, training massive AI models requires more compute power than a non-profit's donation box can handle. Enter the "capped profit" subsidiary: OpenAI LP. Investors could now put money in, but returns were capped at 100x. Still idealistic by VC standards, but a crack in the nonprofit armor. July of that year is when Microsoft stepped in with their partnership and $1 billion investment. This is also about the time OpenAI started to resemble a business in a nonprofit trench coat.

Even in the early days, OpenAI wasn’t exactly a stranger to internal drama. Elon Musk exited in 2018 after a failed bid for control, though they cited conflicts of interest with Tesla’s own AI work. Then in 2020, a wave of execs, including Dario Amodei, left to form Anthropic. They noted a growing concern that OpenAI was drifting away from its original mission and moving too fast without enough guardrails, claiming that Anthropic has a greater focus on AI Safety. The split marked the beginning of an ideological fault line in the AI world: build fast vs. build safe.

Then came the November 2023 crisis.

Sam Altman, the public face of OpenAI, was suddenly fired by the non-profit board for being “not consistently candid in his communications.” The reasons were vague and speculation flew. Generally, it was understood that there was a fundamental disagreement about speed versus safety, and commercialization versus research purity.

The backlash was instant.

• 95% of employees threatened to quit.

• Microsoft (OpenAI's biggest investor) offered to hire the entire team.

• The board became internet enemy #1.

Within five days, Altman was back. Key board members who pushed him out resigned and the board was replaced. Microsoft, previously without any place on the board, was granted an observer seat.

The message was clear: OpenAI had grown too big, too valuable, and too central to the AI revolution to be governed like a traditional nonprofit. The employees, investors, and frankly the entire tech ecosystem had spoken. OpenAI survived, but its governance structure didn’t.

Now we're watching the inevitable conclusion unfold.

• This week, OpenAI completed restructuring into a traditional for-profit, with the nonprofit maintaining a minority stake.

• The company's valuation has hit $150 billion.

• There's rumblings of an IPO, skyrocketing valuation to an estimated $1 Trillion.

• The cap on investor returns is gone.

• Microsoft struck a new deal, so that they no longer lose the rights to OpenAI’s tech once the company reaches AGI.

This is the heart of the modern AI dilemma.

1. The AI tools are about to change. A public OpenAI faces Wall Street's quarterly report cards. That means less experimentation, more "safe" features, and a focus on what sells rather than what's groundbreaking. Remember when Google was all about organizing the world's information? Yeah, that.

2. The tech talent ecosystem goes haywire. When OpenAI employees cash out, we're talking about hundreds of newly minted millionaires flooding the market. Some will start competitors. Others will join rivals. A few will build that weird AI startup idea they've been sketching on napkins. This redistribution of talent could spark the next wave of AI innovation, or create a thousand similar companies.

3. Innovation might actually speed up (plot twist). Public companies live and die by growth metrics. OpenAI will need to ship new features constantly to justify that valuation. Good news for users wanting more capabilities. Bad news if you liked the careful, methodical approach to AI safety.

4. Get ready for the pricing squeeze. Public markets hate unpredictable revenue. Those generous free tiers and "we'll figure out monetization later" attitudes are gone. Whether you're a solo creator using ChatGPT or a Fortune 500 buying enterprise licenses, I’d expect prices to climb and experiments to end.

The irony is wild: OpenAI set out to ensure AI remained open and beneficial to humanity. They may end up doing exactly that, just not in the way they imagined. By going public, they'll face scrutiny, governance requirements, and market forces that could provide more accountability than any nonprofit board ever could.

Or they could become another tech giant optimizing for shareholder value above all else. Place your bets.

CTV ads made easy: Black Friday edition

As with any digital ad campaign, the important thing is to reach streaming audiences who will convert. Roku’s self-service Ads Manager stands ready with powerful segmentation and targeting — plus creative upscaling tools that transform existing assets into CTV-ready video ads. Bonus: we’re gifting you $5K in ad credits when you spend your first $5K on Roku Ads Manager. Just sign up and use code GET5K. Terms apply.

Use code GET5K now

AI in the News

1. NVIDIA hits $5 trillion market cap.
   The AI chip king is now the world’s second-most valuable company, riding the wave of every AI boom from chatbots to robotics. Analysts are calling this a bubble. Investors are calling it Thursday.
   Read more →

2. Cameo sues OpenAI over Sora-generated deepfake ad.
   Cameo filed a trademark infringement lawsuit, claiming OpenAI's video model Sora generated false ads using its brand and likenesses. The legal gray zone around synthetic content just got a whole lot more… colorful.
   Read more →

3. OpenAI board restructuring again.
   After last year's nonprofit drama, OpenAI is once again reconfiguring its board and structure. New additions are expected, and some say it’s all a prelude to a potential IPO.
   Read more →

TL;DR:

• OpenAI started as an idealistic nonprofit to make AGI safe and open.

• The structure changed to raise money, then drama exploded when Altman was fired and rehired.

• Now, OpenAI looks more like a traditional tech company, possibly heading for IPO.

• Lawsuits and governance reshuffles are heating up.

• Enterprise teams should reassess long-term alignment and risk with vendor partners like OpenAI.

Stay sharp,

Cat Valverde
Founder, Enterprise AI Solutions
Navigating Tomorrow’s Tech Landscape Together